Scanlon, Mary Gay RSS Articles

Congresswoman Scanlon, Senator Murphy Introduce Legislation to Ban Private Equity Ownership of Hospitals and Nursing Homes

Thu, 26 Mar 2026 04:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) and Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) this week introduced the Take Back Our Hospitals Act, legislation that would prohibit private equity firms from owning hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. The bill responds to a growing crisis driven by private equity’s takeover of health care providers across the country—a model that has produced higher prices, worse care, mass layoffs, and a record wave of health care bankruptcies, stripping communities of the hospitals they depend on.

Rep. Scanlon has led a continuing effort to sound the alarm on private equity’s takeover of medicine. Shortly after she took office, Rep. Scanlon raised concerns over the financial practices of Leonard Green & Partners that placed Prospect Medical Holdings facilities and patients at risk, and has continued to criticize reductions in service, facility closures, and harmful business practices. She raised the issue in oversight hearings with the Federal Trade Commission, and in June 2024, she led House and Senate colleagues in submitting a detailed response to a landmark cross-government inquiry by the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Health and Human Services on consolidation and corporate greed in health care markets. Rep. Scanlon’s submission detailed the damage inflicted on Crozer Health and Hahnemann University Hospital by their respective private equity owners, and called on regulators to treat long-term financial viability as a factor in antitrust review of health care mergers.

“What happened to Crozer Health is a cautionary tale for communities all over the country. Prospect Medical Holdings, a private equity firm, acquired the Crozer Health system, promising increased investment and better care. Instead, it drove Crozer into bankruptcy, closing four hospitals, laying off 2,600 health care professionals, and leaving Delaware County with just two hospitals to serve its 585,000 residents,” said Rep. Scanlon. “This is what happens when private equity treats our hospitals as cash cows. We cannot allow Wall Street’s race for profits to shutter more hospitals and nursing homes. The Take Back Our Hospitals Act will ensure that hospitals and nursing homes exist to serve patients, not Wall Street investors.”

“Private equity’s general business model is pretty simple: find hospitals that are in dire financial straits, make promises to fix things and then squeeze every cent they can out of patients before leaving communities to deal with the wreckage," said Senator Murphy. “I saw this happen in Connecticut and it was devastating for patients and for the doctors and nurses who were desperately trying to take care of people as facilities were falling apart and supplies ran short. Patient care, not profit, should be the priority in hospital and nursing home care, and my legislation would get these firms out of health care and allow hospitals and nursing homes to put care first.”

“We didn’t just witness the devastating consequences of private equity ownership during the collapse of Crozer Health in Delaware County—we were on the ground and at the bedside, living through it in real time. We saw what happens when profit is prioritized over patient care: Patients, frontline healthcare workers, and entire communities pay the price in the moment, and they continue to pay the price for years afterward," said Maureen May, RN, president of PASNAP, the Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals, which represents more than 11,000 frontline caregivers across Pennsylvania. "Private equity used Crozer as a piggy bank, ruthlessly and systematically draining what was once a four-hospital health system of every penny, and healthcare in Delaware County is still destabilized today, a year after Crozer's doors closed. Surrounding hospitals are still struggling to deal with the flood of patients, and community members are still struggling to access care. The Take Back Our Hospitals Act is a critical step toward ensuring this doesn't happen anywhere else, ever again, and PASNAP is proud to support this effort to protect our patients, our hospitals, and our healthcare system.”

The Take Back Our Hospitals Act would bar hospitals and skilled nursing facilities from receiving Medicare funds if they are owned by a private equity company, effectively prohibiting private equity ownership of these providers. To protect patients and ensure continuity of care, the bill provides a three-year transition period for private equity-owned providers to complete a sale or transfer.

Private equity investment in health care has grown from $5 billion in 2000 to an estimated $104 billion in 2024. The consequences have been severe: studies show private equity ownership leads to higher prices, staffing cuts, and worse patient outcomes, and 2023 set a record for private equity-owned health care bankruptcies. The Take Back Our Hospitals Act would close the door on this failed model and ensure that patient care remains the primary obligation of hospitals and nursing homes.

The legislation is endorsed by the American Economic Liberties Project, Public Citizen, Private Equity Stakeholder Project, Center for Health and Democracy, Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals, Service Employees International Union, National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, Community Catalyst, National Nurses United, and the Committee to Protect Health Care.

Find the full bill text here.

###

Congresswoman Scanlon Announces Class of 2030 Service Academy Nominees

Fri, 20 Feb 2026 05:00:00 GMT

Chester, PA — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) today announced her nominees for appointment to the United States service academies for the Class of 2030. The 25 local high school students and their families were honored by Congresswoman Scanlon during a recognition ceremony on Sunday, February 15, at her district office in Chester, PA.

Members of Congress may nominate candidates for appointment to four of the five U.S. service academies: the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, U.S. Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, and U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point. The fifth service academy, the U.S. Coast Guard Academy at New London, does not require a congressional nomination for appointment.

“I was honored to celebrate these accomplished young men and women of the Class of 2030 and their commitment to serving our country,” said Rep. Scanlon. “Our youth are the future of our country, and I am confident that my young constituents will flourish as future leaders. I commend them on their nominations and look forward to their journeys should they elect to attend one of the service academies.”

Candidates were interviewed and recommended for nomination by the PA-05 Service Academy Selection Board, led by Chairman Harry “Skip” Dittmann (Navy). Members of the Selection Board include: Dave Carroll (Navy), Jack Guernsey (Army), Arthur Jenkins (Army), Jim King (Air Force), Kathryn Kirkman (Air Force), John Lunger (Navy), and Sharnae White (Army).

Photos from the recognition ceremony are available here for media use.

The following students from PA-05 received nominations:

United States Air Force Academy

Ahmed Mizead – William J. Palmer High School*
Calvin Costello – Harriton High School*
Connor Haines – Radnor High School*
Eliana Byun – Garnet Valley High School*
Jadon Truong – Haverford High School
Keira Conner – Archmere Academy*
Liam McKelvey – Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School*
Sean Lawson – Haverford High School*
Tyresse Gordon – Roman Catholic High School

United States Merchant Marine Academy

Bryce Furey – Radnor High School
Calvin Costello – Harriton High School*
Ignatius Barry – Valley Forge Military Academy

United States Military Academy

Ahmed Mizead – William J. Palmer High School*
Andrew Tuturice, Jr. – Valley Forge Military Academy
Casey Jannetta – Episcopal Academy*
Connor Haines – Radnor High School*
Eliana Byun – Garnet Valley High School*
Felicia Grimmelbein – Garnet Valley High School*
Keira Conner – Archmere Academy*
Liam McKelvey – Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School*
Nash Grant – Penncrest High School
Robert Valcich III – Strath Haven High School

United States Naval Academy

Casey Jannetta – Episcopal Academy*
Connor Haines – Radnor High School*
Eliana Byun – Garnet Valley High School*
Felicia Grimmelbein – Garnet Valley High School*
Gavin McLain – Cardinal O'Hara High School
Laura Esgro – Penn State University; Villa Maria Academy High School (‘25)
Liam McKelvey – Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School*
Lily Peters – Delaware County Christian School
Lukas Grabowsky – Unionville High School
Margaret Wetzel – Radnor High School
Margaretta Potten – Archbishop John Carroll High School
Samuel White – St. Andrew's School
Seamus Fabrey – La Salle College High School
Sean Lawson – Haverford High School*
Spencer Meile – Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

*Nominated to multiple service academies.

###

Scanlon, Judiciary Democrats Demand DHS and ICE Rescind Memo Authorizing Warrantless Home Raids

Tue, 03 Feb 2026 05:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, today joined Reps. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee; Pramila Jayapal, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement; and Lucy McBath, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance on a letter to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Todd Lyons demanding that the agencies immediately rescind a memorandum authorizing federal agents to enter homes without a judicial warrant, in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Earlier this month, whistleblowers within the agency provided Congress with a May 12, 2025, memorandum signed by Acting Director Lyons that purports to allow federal immigration enforcement officers to violate the Fourth Amendment and forcibly enter homes without review or permission from a federal judge. The memo has led to unlawful, forced home entries in Minnesota and across the country.

“ICE does not have the authority to overturn any law, let alone one of the foundational constitutional rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights. You must rescind this memo and adhere to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment by ensuring your agents obtain a judicial warrant prior to making any non-consensual entry into a private residence,” wrote the Ranking Members.

During recent enforcement operations in Minnesota’s Twin Cities, federal agents have repeatedly forced their way into private homes without judicial warrants or consent.

In one disturbing case, masked agents broke into the home of U.S. citizen ChongLy “Scott” Thao in St. Paul, refused to review his identification, held him at gunpoint, and removed him from his home in freezing temperatures while he was wearing only sandals and underwear. After realizing they had entered the wrong home and that Mr. Thao was a citizen with no criminal record, agents returned him and left without apology. The man ICE intended to arrest in this operation was already in prison.

In another incident, agents forcibly entered the home of Garrison Gibson, a Liberian man, without producing a warrant. A federal judge later ruled that his arrest violated his Constitutional rights and ordered his release.

ICE’s own training materials acknowledge that warrantless home entries typically violate the Fourth Amendment and that administrative warrants do not require criminal probable cause.

DHS General Counsel Jimmy Percival has pushed unsubstantiated claims that non-citizens are not protected by the Fourth Amendment. No precedent has held or even suggested such a reading of the Fourth Amendment, and the amendment’s text specifically refers to the rights of “people” rather than “citizens.”

“The law is clear: ICE does not have the authority to overturn any legal precedent, let alone ignore one of the foundational constitutional rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights,” concluded the Ranking Members.

The Ranking Members are demanding that DHS and ICE immediately rescind the May 12 memo and ensure that agents obtain judicial warrants before entering private residences without consent.

You can read the full letter here.

###

Congresswoman Scanlon Announces Winner of 2025 Congressional App Challenge

Wed, 31 Dec 2025 05:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) today announced the winner of the 2025 Congressional App Challenge. The Congressional App Challenge (CAC) is an opportunity for students in PA-05 to create and submit their original app for a chance to win the Challenge competing against students from all over the country. In order to participate in the competition: Students must be in middle or high school by the time the competition ends and must either live or go to school in the registered district they wish to compete in; and, apps can be coded on any platform, on any language, on any theme.

“The annual Congressional App Challenge is a great program that engages our youth in STEM-related fields,” said Rep. Scanlon. “At a time when science and technology fields are rapidly evolving, it’s important that we invest in programs that help our youth develop skills for success in the future. I’m pleased to celebrate all of our participants this year and congratulate this year’s winner.”

A team of judges evaluated six submissions using a rubric to rate each of the apps along two general categories — Concept and Technology.

This year’s first-place winner is Allison Tan from Lower Merion High School, who came up with OpiWarrior, an iOS app that helps people quickly find nearby pharmacies that stock buprenorphine, a life-saving medication for opioid use disorder. Runner up Christopher Armstrong from Strath Haven High School coded the app Coaster Dreams, a minimalistic, open-ended roller coaster design video game.

###

Congresswoman Scanlon’s Bipartisan Bill to Support Firefighters with Service-Related Cancers Heads to the President’s Desk

Wed, 17 Dec 2025 05:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) today applauded the final passage of her bipartisan bill that will expand access to federal death and disability benefits for families of firefighters and other first responders who contract service-related cancers. The Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act, which now heads to the President's desk for signature, will expand the Public Safety Officer’s Benefits Program (PSOB) to cover specific cancers linked to firefighting and emergency response, and make the expansion retroactive, so that families can claim PSOB benefits for deceased loved ones.

Today, cancer is the leading cause of death for America’s firefighters. Currently, firefighters are only eligible for support under the Public Safety Officer Benefits (PSOB) program for physical injuries sustained in the line of duty or for deaths from duty-related heart attacks, strokes, mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, and 9/11-related illnesses. But this program does not cover service-related cancer deaths, despite a wealth of evidence linking first responder service to developing cancer.

The bill is endorsed by the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), the Congressional Fire Services Institute (CFSI), the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), and 10 other organizations representing first responders. The bill is co-led by Representatives Carlos Gimenez (FL-28), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-01), and Gabe Amo (RI-01). Its Senate counterpart is led by Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MG) and Kevin Cramer (R-ND).

“Every day, firefighters and police officers face exposure to deadly carcinogens that take a devastating toll long after the flames are out,” said Rep. Scanlon. “I have had many conversations with the families of fallen firefighters who not only have to deal with the pain of losing a loved one, but who also face the struggle of supporting themselves financially when the primary breadwinner is gone. When first responders develop cancer because of their service, they and their families deserve our full support. That’s why I spent the better part of this year working to advance my bill to close this benefits gap. In the end, we brought together 175 Democrats and Republicans over shared values: respect for service, care for grieving families, and the belief that our country must honor sacrifice not just in remembrance, but through tangible support. I am grateful to my colleagues who joined me in building bipartisan consensus for this bill, which required setting aside partisanship and focusing on our fundamental obligations to one another as a nation.”

“I also want to extend a special thanks to the International Association of Fire Fighters for bringing the experiences of firefighters and their families to the forefront, ensuring that this work stayed grounded in real lives and real sacrifice," Rep. Scanlon continued. “Lastly, I’m deeply grateful to the families, advocates, and colleagues whose voices and perseverance helped turn loss into lasting change.”

On December 3, 2025, Scanlon and Gimenez led a bipartisan coalition of 36 lawmakers urging congressional leadership to ensure the inclusion of the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act (H.R. 1269 / S. 237) in the final Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). A week later, on December 10, it passed the House, teeing it up for the Senate to clear and send to the President’s desk today.

“The IAFF is thankful for the leadership demonstrated by Representatives Scanlon and Gimenez in leading the House’s passage of the Honor Act. When enacted into law, the survivors of fallen fire fighters will receive the benefits that they have been denied for decades,” said IAFF General President Edward A. Kelly.

Find the full bill text here.

More about the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act:

The Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act would expand the Public Safety Officer’s Benefits Program (PSOB) to cover certain cancers and cancer-related deaths. The PSOB program provides death, disability, and educational benefits to first responders who are killed or injured in the line of duty and their survivors. Firefighters are frequently exposed to carcinogens during their service and are more likely to develop and die from cancer as a result. Currently, the PSOB program does not cover cancer-related disabilities or death. The Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act would expand the PSOB program to cover specific cancers linked to firefighting and emergency response, and it would make this expansion retroactive so that families can claim PSOB benefits for deceased loved ones.

The Public Safety Officers' Benefits (PSOB) program provides benefits to the survivors of firefighters, law enforcement officers, and other first responders who are killed as a result of injuries sustained in the line of duty. The program also provides disability benefits for first responders who become permanently or totally disabled. The Public Safety Officers' Educational Assistance (PSOEA) program, a component of the PSOB program, provides higher-education assistance to the children and spouses of public safety officers killed or permanently disabled in the line of duty. The PSOB and PSOEA programs are administered by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).

Complete list of endorsing organizations: International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies (ASCIA), Congressional Fire Services Institute (CFSI), Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA), Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC), Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA), Metropolitan Fire Chiefs Association (Metro Chiefs), National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO), National Fallen Firefighters Foundation (NFFF), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), National Narcotics Officers’ Associations’ Coalition (NNOAC), and National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC).

“Being a law enforcement officer is a dangerous job, and our members not only expose themselves to physical threats, but threats from hazardous environments as well. This bill finally recognizes the dangers that our officers place themselves in every day. The FOP is grateful to our allies in the House and Senate who supported our efforts,” said Patrick Yoes, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police.

“The Congressional Fire Services Institute (CFSI) is pleased to see the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act become law as part of the National Defense Authorization Act. Occupational cancer—a leading cause of firefighter deaths—will now be recognized under the Public Safety Officers' Benefits Program, helping to align federal policy with the realities of the job and ensure that firefighters and their families receive the support they need,” said CFSI Executive Director Bill Webb. “CFSI thanks Senators Klobuchar and Cramer, Representatives Scanlon and Gimenez, and all members of Congress who helped to pass this legislation. This marks a critical step forward in addressing the occupational cancer risks faced by our nation’s firefighters.”

“The IAFC is grateful to see the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act included in the NDAA and on its way to being signed into law,” said Fire Chief Trisha L. Wolford, the President and Board Chair of the International Association of Fire Chiefs. “This long overdue reform ensures that the families of fire, law enforcement, and EMS personnel who die or become disabled from occupational cancer receive the federal benefits they deserve. By including occupational cancers in the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits program, Congress is honoring the sacrifices made by our fallen heroes and standing firmly with the families they leave behind. We commend the bipartisan champions, including Representatives Mary Gay Scanlon and Carlos A. Gimenez, the bill’s House sponsors, and Senators Amy Klobuchar and Kevin Cramer, the bill’s Senate sponsors, who advanced this critical measure and thank lawmakers in both chambers for their commitment to our nation’s fire and EMS personnel,” said Fire Chief Trisha L. Wolford, the President and Board Chair of the International Association of Fire Chiefs.

“On behalf of the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation, I applaud the House for passing this important bipartisan legislation. I especially would like to thank Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon and Congressman Carlos Gimenez for leading this effort,” said Victor Stagnaro, CEO of the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation. “Firefighters put their lives on the line every day to keep their communities safe. By recognizing fire service–related cancers under the PSOB program, we ensure that those who risk their health for others receive the support they and their families deserve. I especially want to thank our brave Fire Hero Families who tirelessly advocated for the passage of this vital legislation. Their dedication, passion, and tenacity are why this bill will soon become law.”

“I applaud the leadership of Representatives Scanlon and Gimenez along with Senators Klobuchar and Cramer in getting the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act signed into law. This vital legislation will do a great deal to help the families of first responders who are too often left struggling after their loved ones are killed or permanently disabled after battles with occupation related cancer,” said Steve Hirsch, Chair, National Volunteer Fire Council.

“Our nation’s law enforcement and public safety officers put their lives at risk each day. This certainly includes officers pulling families from polluted flood waters or rescuing children from house fires or responding to chemical spills. These acts of heroism often have long-term consequences for the officers, including exposure-related cancers. The passage of the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act recognizes these cancers as line-of-duty injuries under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Program and ensures that these officers and their families are protected. We thank Representatives Scanlon and Gimenez for championing this important issue and working with us in support of our nation’s officers,” said Bill Johnson, Executive Director, National Association of Police Organizations.

“On behalf of our law enforcement officers across the nation, I want to commend Representative Scanlon for securing the inclusion of the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act in the NDAA,” said National President Mathew Silverman of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA). “Its passage is a vital step in ensuring law enforcement officers who develop cancer due to their service receive the support and benefits they deserve. We are grateful for Representative Scanlon’s leadership and proud to stand with her in advancing this essential protection for our nation’s officers.”

“The passage of the ‘Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act’ is a tremendous victory for the families of law enforcement officers, firefighters, and other public safety personnel who succumb to job-related cancers,” said President Vincent Vallelong of the NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association. “The 9/11 health crisis has made us well aware of the serious health risks that our members face from exposures to known carcinogens. The SBA is grateful for the leadership of Rep. Scanlon, and proud of our collaborative, bipartisan effort to ensure the inclusion of this important legislation in the final National Defense Authorization Act.”

###

Ranking Member Scanlon’s Opening Statement at Subcommittee Hearing on Republicans’ Misguided Balanced Budget Amendment Push

Wed, 03 Dec 2025 05:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, today delivered opening remarks at a subcommittee hearing on Republicans’ misguided attempt to advance a balanced budget amendment, just as they add trillions of dollars to the national debt by gifting their billionaire buddies generous handouts on the backs of hardworking Americans.

Below are Ranking Member Scanlon’s remarks, as prepared for delivery, at today’s hearing.

WATCH Ranking Member Scanlon’s opening statement.

“Good morning, and thank you to our witnesses for testifying today.

The decisions that Congress makes about the economy, about taxes, spending, and budgets, are, or should be, decisions about values—who we’re fighting for, what kind of country we are, or want to be, and the future we’re trying to create for our children.

That brings us to the topic of today’s hearing, a balanced budget constitutional amendment—a misguided proposal about how to address the often competing values and interests that must be taken into account when crafting our national budget.

Of course, we all share the goal of developing smart, efficient fiscal policy and budgets, but for decades, Republican presidents and members of Congress have talked a big game about “fiscal responsibility” while enacting policies that have exploded the federal deficit and the national debt.

It wasn't that long ago, about 25 years, when under the Clinton administration the US had a balanced budget, fueled in part by a combination of tax increases, spending cuts and reduced military spending. But since then, in the early 2000s and again during the first Trump administration, Republicans have handed the ultrawealthy huge tax breaks, eroding the federal government’s revenue base and threatening our ability to fund essential programs that Americans rely on.

Time and again, these policies have failed to produce the broader benefits for all Americans that the advocates of “trickle down economics” have promised. And instead, they exploded the deficit, adding $10 trillion to the national debt.

Despite this, this summer Republicans once again doubled down, permanently extending tax giveaways to the wealthy in their One Big Ugly Bill, further expanding the deficit and ballooning the national debt. Now, after voting for that policy, our Republican colleagues think it’s time for them to turn around and make a show of caring about fiscal responsibility.

But, don’t be fooled. Today’s hearing is just part of a decades-long, orchestrated political effort to help corporations and the wealthiest people avoid paying their fair share, a theory that tries to convince people that reckless tax giveaways to corporations and billionaires somehow stimulate investment and economic growth for everyone, for the greater good—a lie that’s been debunked again and again for more than 50 years, and one that’s led to sky-high income inequality and the enshrinement of a corporate oligarchy in our society.

These tax policies, these giveaways, have fueled the greatest rise in income inequality that our country has ever known, resulting in a continuing transfer of wealth from working and middle class Americans to the wealthiest people in our country. And we need look no further than the fact that the top 1% in our country pay a lower tax rate than all other Americans.

This pathological dedication to trickle-down economics is outrageous. It betrays the values that this country should stand for, and which our budgets should reflect.

If we want to shrink the deficit and lower the nation’s debt, we should be talking about a tax policy that gives relief to working families and makes the rich and corporations pay their fair share, rather than allowing them to reap even more profits by imposing the costs of their businesses on the American people by paying substandard wages or poisoning the environment. This isn’t a radical idea.

A tax policy that makes sure that everyone pays their fair share should be the starting point of any serious discussion about bringing the two sides of the budget equation: taxes and revenue on the one hand and spending, including military spending on the other. But, it takes a different kind of politics than what we’re hearing today—one that believes the purpose of government is to serve all Americans, not just the wealthy and well-connected.

And the programs that our Republican colleagues have been only too ready to slash, in their Big Ugly Bill and with political scam “balanced budget amendment” they are pushing in this hearing, are critical to the health and well-being of the American people.

The majority of our yearly spending is mandatory—that is, funds not subject to Congressional appropriations and which must be paid, including: Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, veterans’ benefits, and retirement programs for military service members and federal employees. These are vital programs that help our government keep its promises to the American people.

Less than half of our budget goes to discretionary spending, which is spending Congress appropriates each year, and half of that money goes to defense spending.

We can make sure our national debt is on a sustainable path by investing wisely in the American people and taxing fairly. We can work to build an economy that grows from the middle out, not the top down. We can provide affordable health care and child care, affordable housing, and make sure that every child in America gets a world-class public education.

But, that’s not what our Republican colleagues want to focus on today. Instead, their solution to the deficit problem they helped create is to propose Constitutional amendments that force Congress to balance the budget on the backs of working and middle-class families—forcing cuts to essential benefits like Medicare and Social Security.

House Republicans have introduced at least six different proposed amendments. Though they don’t all share the same features, they all have the same common goal: to continue to put their thumb on the scale to favor big business and billionaires over working and middle-class people, seniors, and our most vulnerable Americans.

A balanced budget amendment would shackle Congress and limit our flexibility to respond to changing economic conditions or crises with appropriate fiscal and budgetary policies. Tellingly, many of our Republican colleagues’ proposals would require a supermajority in Congress to raise revenue or the debt limit, but not to cut spending.

The framers of our Constitution rejected the principle of requiring a supermajority for basic government functions because they believed it would shift power away from the American people’s popular will to a determined minority. Balanced budget proposals requiring a supermajority would allow an extremist minority to hold our nation’s economy and financial stability hostage.

You only need to look at the chaos of the current Republican majority to see what might be in store under a proposed amendment.

We’ve seen political brinksmanship over the debt ceiling and government funding. We’ve seen Speakers dethroned and federal budgets that slash health care and food assistance for Americans, while giving more handouts to the ultrawealthy.

A balanced budget amendment would only make things worse, and this dysfunction would be baked into our Constitution and democracy forever. That’s not what the American people want, or need.

The bottom line is, we don’t need to amend the Constitution to balance the federal budget. Our colleagues need to get their heads out of the sand and be willing to look at the revenue side of the equation. During the 1990s, under a Democratic president and a Republican controlled Congress, the federal government ran budget surpluses without a balanced budget amendment.

Our Republican colleagues control the House, the Senate, and the White House. If they wanted to do this, they could.

But, instead, they’ve chosen to make their number one legislative priority this term a trillion-dollar handout to their billionaire buddies. Our budget is not just numbers on a spreadsheet. It’s the choices we make: To invest in our neighbors and communities, to provide opportunities for young people, to take care of the elderly and the most vulnerable, and to invest in American prosperity.

If we want a truly prosperous economy where everyone can get ahead, we need to abandon the misguided orthodoxy of trickle-down economics. Instead, we need to focus on policies that support children, families, communities, and working people.

We don’t need a balanced budget amendment. We just need to do the job the American people sent us to do.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.”

###

Scanlon, Huffman, Bonamici, McBath, DeSaulnier Urge Department of Education To Halt Transfer of Special Education Programs To HHS

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 05:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) last week led Reps. Jared Huffman (CA-02), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Lucy McBath (GA-07), Mark DeSaulnier (CA-10) and 37 House Democrats in urging the Department of Education to halt efforts to transfer special education programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Relocation of IDEA programs would violate congressional intent and threaten to further upend the lives of millions of students with disabilities and their families. The members’ inquiry is a follow up to an April 21 letter to address similar questions and concerns.

“As we discussed in our April 21 letter, students with disabilities across the country rely on IDEA to access the free appropriate public education to which they are legally entitled. Shifting IDEA oversight to HHS without congressional authorization is not only illegal, but it also jeopardizes federal investments in and oversight over special education programs,” the members wrote.

“Despite this Administration’s previous attempt to eliminate nearly the entire staff at the OSERS, the Department of Education remains the only federal agency with expertise, institutional knowledge, and established relationships with state and local education agencies to properly administer IDEA. We remain concerned that moving IDEA to HHS would improperly shift special education toward a medical model rather than an educational right,” the members continued.

The members requested answers to the following questions by December 22, 2025:

What steps has the Department taken towards transferring IDEA administration to another federal agency?
What statutory authority do you have to move IDEA programs to another agency?
What evidence do you have that such a transfer will not negatively affect students with disabilities’ access to a free appropriate public education?
If you were to move forward with a transfer despite lacking the necessary authority, what office within HHS would assume responsibility for IDEA?
What other programs within the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services is the Department considering relocating, and what agencies and offices would receive those programs?
1. How has the staffing level in these offices changed since the beginning of this year?
Has HHS notified you that it will implement to guarantee that the full intent and legal obligations of IDEA are upheld?
Are you aware of any concrete steps that HHS will take to ensure that states and local education agencies receive the necessary support and guidance to comply with federal special education requirements? If so, what are those steps?
Has the Administration consulted with stakeholders, including disability rights advocates and special education professionals, regarding this transfer? If so, how were those consultations conducted, and what concerns were raised?

“We remain strongly opposed to efforts to transfer IDEA to HHS and urge you to properly consider the effects this change will have on millions of students with disabilities and their families,” the members concluded.

Find full text of the letter here.

###

Scanlon Presses Social Security Administration Regarding Rule Changes Threatening Ability of Supplemental Security Income Recipients to Live With Family

Tue, 18 Nov 2025 05:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) and Rep. Danny Davis (IL-07), Ranking Member of the Ways & Means Subcommittee on Work and Welfare, today led 73 House Democrats in raising objections to Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano regarding a proposed change that would limit eligibility for disabled adults and children receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.

“Almost 8 million Americans rely on SSI to afford basic necessities like food and shelter – all of these SSI recipients are older Americans, people with disabilities, or children. Given the vulnerability of those relying on SSI benefits, we must take care to do no harm,” the members wrote. “Cutting these benefits – especially at a time of rapid inflation and a rising cost-of-living – threatens to inflict extreme hardship and immediate poverty on thousands of individuals and families.”

The 2024 rule recognized that low-income and disabled individuals often rely on family or community members for assistance by expanding the definition of what was considered a “public assistance household.” The final rule also removed barriers that unnecessarily penalized individuals for receiving familial support. Further, by simplifying the SSI application, the final rule simultaneously helped seniors and people with disabilities, as well as improved the efficiency of SSI processing. As a result, almost 400,000 additional struggling households qualified for SSI or received increased benefits. The proposed change could cause hundreds of thousands of SSI recipients, including disabled adults and children, to have their benefits cut or lose eligibility entirely.

“Families would be discouraged from offering help to their loved ones for fear of jeopardizing their benefits. Seniors, persons with disabilities, and children deserve to live at home with family who love them. The proposed change shamefully threatens already-struggling families with the impossible choice of loss of disability benefits versus homelessness or institutionalization. Cutting this essential support will tear families apart by penalizing SSI recipients for staying with their loved ones,” the members continued.

“The SSA has claimed that reversing this rule will 'promote program integrity,' but it has failed to provide any information on the expected impact of this policy or any numbers on how much these cuts would actually save,” the members concluded.

The members requested the following information regarding this rule change:

Please provide any documents or analysis estimating the number of households that will see their benefits cut as a result of this rule change.
1. How many individuals are estimated to live in these households?
2. How many of these individuals are disabled?
3. How many of these individuals are seniors?
4. How many of these individuals are terminally ill?
5. How many of these individuals are children?
6. How many of these individuals are children with severe disabilities?
7. How many of these individuals have no other source of income?
What is the average benefit cut under this rule reversal?
How many individuals will lose their health insurance as a result of this policy?
What is the total estimated “savings” from this rule change? How are these “savings” determined? Do these savings include additional administrative costs incurred by SSA as a result of the rule change?
What will be the administrative costs that SSA incurs as a result of this rule change?
Has your agency calculated the potential extraneous costs associated with cutting or eliminating these benefits, including but not limited to, increased burden on foster care systems, hospitals, policing, food and housing shelters, etc.? What are these costs?
Did the Administration consult experts, medical professionals or families who will be affected by the policy prior to announcement? Please provide details of those consultations.
How much will this policy increase workloads for SSA staff at local offices? Please provide specific details on the impact this policy will have on waiting times for appointments and claims processing.
Please describe SSA's plans to implement the rule change, including drafting clear notices, staffing benefits reviews, and handling telephone and field office inquiries.
Please provide historical data from 1980 forward on SSI recipients living in public income maintenance (PIM) households, both in raw numbers and as a percentage of SSI enrollment.
Please provide data on how many public assistance households currently rely on each of the following programs/payments:
1. TANF
2. Refugee Act need payments
3. Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
4. General assistance programs of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
5. State or local government assistance programs based on need
6. Department of Veterans Affairs programs (payments based on need).
7. Please provide any additional information about the budgetary and human impacts of these changes that your agency took into account when designing these proposed changes.

The letter is endorsed by Democratic Women’s Caucus and co-signed by Reps. John Larson (CT-01), Don Beyer (VA-08), Brendan Boyle (PA-02), Judy Chu (CA-28), Suzan DelBene (WA-01), Lloyd Doggett (TX-35), Dwight Evans (PA-03), Jimmy Gomez (CA-34), Gwen Moore (WI-04), Steven Horsford (NV-04), Jimmy Panetta (CA-19), Stacey Plaskett (VI-AL), Linda Sanchez (CA-39), Bradley Schneider (IL-10), Terri Sewell (AL-07), Thomas Suozzi (NY-03), Mike Thompson (CA-04), Becca Balint (VT-AL), Andre Carson (IN-07), Gilbert Cisneros (CA-31), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Sharice Davids (KS-03), Diana DeGette (CO-01), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Debbie Dingell (MI-06), Cleo Fields (LA-06), Valerie Foushee (NC-04), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), Sylvia Garcia (TX-29), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05), Al Green (TX-09), Chrissy Houlahan (PA-06), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Jonathan Jackson (IL-01), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Robin Kelly (IL-02), Timothy Kennedy (NY-26), Summer Lee (PA-12), Ted Lieu (CA-36), Seth Magaziner (RI-02), Betty McCollum (MI-04), James McGovern (MA-02), Rob Menendez (NJ-08), Grace Meng (NY-06), Seth Moulton (MA-06), Kevin Mullin (CA-15), Jerrold Nadler (NY-12), Eleanor Norton-Holmes (DC-AL), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Brittany Pettersen (CO-07), Chellie Pingree (ME-01), Delia Ramirez (IL-03), Emily Randall (WA-06), Jamie Raskin (MD-08), Deborah Ross (NC-02), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Lateefah Simon(CA-12), Adam Smith (WA-09), Eric Swalwell (CA-14), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Dina Titus (NV-03), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Paul Tonko (NY-20), Ritchie Torres (NY-15), Juan Vargas (CA-52), Marc Veasey (TX-33), Nydia Velazquez (NY-12), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-25), Bonnie Watson-Coleman (NJ-12), and Frederica Wilson (FL-24).

Find full text of the letter here.

###

Scanlon Statement on the Republican Government Shutdown

Wed, 01 Oct 2025 04:00:00 GMT

Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) today released the following statement after President Trump and House Republicans shut down the government instead of working with Democrats to protect Americans’ health care.

“Let me be very clear: The federal government officially ran out of funding at midnight – after Republicans in Congress canceled votes and went on vacation, rather than do their jobs.

“My House Democratic colleagues and I are in Washington, ready to do the people’s business, but Republicans are nowhere to be found. Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House. Instead of working together to keep the government open and address the health care crisis facing Americans, Donald Trump and Republicans decided they would rather shut down the government than work with Democrats to stop a health care crisis of Republicans own making.

“Democrats have been clear for months: We want to keep the government open while addressing the Republican health care crisis and lowering health care costs for America’s working families.

“If Congress does not extend health care tax credits immediately, hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose their health care, and millions more will see their costs skyrocket. In PA-05, that means 24,000 people will see their costs rise dramatically. For a family of four earning $64,000 a year, premiums would increase by $2,571, or 327%.

“Republicans were only too eager to use partisan legislation to extend tax cuts for their billionaire buddies this summer, while enacting devastating cuts to Medicaid. But thus far, they have refused to extend the tax credits that working class Americans rely upon to afford health insurance. Democrats understand the importance of ensuring that Americans have access to affordable health care for their families and are committed to addressing the health care crisis that the Trump White House and Republicans have created for millions of Americans.

“This is a crisis that cannot wait for a solution. Americans have already started receiving notices about skyrocketing health costs and are even now deciding whether they can afford to keep their health coverage. Why don’t Republicans understand the urgency to lower health care costs for middle class families, small business owners, veterans, and children with disabilities?

“My office will remain open and working hard to help constituents navigate this shutdown. Unfortunately, the shutdown means that many federal agencies will be even more severely understaffed and unable to promptly address people's needs, but we will do everything we can to support our constituents.

“It will take a bipartisan agreement to reopen the government and lower health care costs. That's how the American people expect our government to work - not by holding federal workers and the American people hostage. Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans need to come to the table and get to work so that we can reopen the government and save Americans’ health care.”

###

Scanlon Joins Senate Spotlight Forum on Trump Administration’s Attacks on the First Amendment

Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:00:00 GMT

Hearing follows months of the Trump Administration’s abuse of FCC regulatory authorities and attempts to control the free press—including efforts to censor Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, and others.

Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05) yesterday joined House and Senate Democrats in hosting a spotlight forum on the Trump Administration’s unprecedented efforts to use the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and government authority to chill First Amendment-protected speech and independent, fact-based news reporting. The forum featured testimony from Anna Gomez, FCC Commissioner; Connor Gaffney, Counsel at Protect Democracy; Robert Corn-Revere, Chief Counsel at Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE); and Oliver Darcy, Founder and author at Status.

Watch Rep. Scanlon’s line of questioning HERE.

“While Speaker Johnson has closed down the House of Representatives for the week, I was pleased to join a hearing convened by Senators Blumenthal and Warren and Congressman Jamie Raskin to examine how the Trump White House is using the federal government, and particularly the FCC, to suppress criticism of this administration,” said Rep. Scanlon. “We heard testimony from First Amendment experts, including FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, that detailed Chairman Carr's unlawful weaponization of the FCC against media companies to silence the administration’s critics. Testimony highlighted the recent suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel and described instances in which the threat of FCC action has coerced broadcasters into canceling programs and even paying millions of dollars to the Trump Presidential Library Fund. More broadly, the experts also examined the impact of such censorship on Americans' First Amendment rights, compared it to authoritarian regimes in Hungary and elsewhere, and discussed what Congress and the public can do to oppose the Trump administration's efforts to restrict free speech.”

Read more about the expert testimony below:

“This Administration seems intent on using its vast power to punish anyone who dares to speak up and disagree with its agenda. Broadcasters across the country are facing an impossible choice: comply with this Administration’s demands or risk a financially debilitating investigation and the threat of license revocation,” wrote Gomez in her opening statement. “If we allow the government to decide which voices survive and which ones are silenced, we lose the very foundation of a free press, and with it the democratic principles it seeks to protect.”

Gomez’s opening statement (as prepared for delivery) can be found here. Video of Gomez’s opening statement is available here.

“A free, robust, and diverse press is critical for a democratic society. Congress recognized this nearly a century ago when it created the FCC with the Communications Act. Accordingly, Congress created an independent agency to be free of political capture whose powers were to be exercised in the public interest,” wrote Gaffney in his opening statement. “This design has functioned fairly well for the last ninety years. But the FCC under Chairman Carr has shown how this power and trust can be abused, and most concerningly, how easily this power can be wielded to undermine our democratic institutions.”

Gaffney’s opening statement (as prepared for delivery) can be found here. Video of Gaffney’s opening statement is available here.

“Over the past ten months we have witnessed an extraordinary number of formal and informal assertions of power over the broadcast media and the national broadcast networks. Carr has described his actions as business as usual for the FCC. He has said that broadcasters are licensed under the Communications Act to serve the ‘public interest,’ and that he is merely holding them to that commitment. None of this behavior is normal, authorized by the Communications Act, or permitted by the First Amendment,” wrote Corn-Revere in his opening statement.

Corn-Revere’s opening statement (as prepared for delivery) can be found here. Video of Corn-Revere’s opening statement is available here.

“In all my years reporting on this beat, I have never seen free speech and a free press come under such brazen assault. Ironically, the attacks today are coming directly from the President of the United States and his MAGA allies, the same people who campaigned on promises to end ‘censorship,’ ‘legalize comedy,’ and ‘bring back free speech.’ Instead, nine months into this Administration, fact-based reporting and even late-night jokes have become targets of an aggrieved President, with Trump wielding his office to bully critics into submission and chill their speech. The message he has sent is clear: cross me and pay the price,” wrote Darcy in his opening statement. “The chilling of speech is one of the first signs that a democracy is beginning to decay. That is not hyperbole. Strongmen thrive when speech is stifled—and that is precisely the environment Trump and his allies are working to create.”

Darcy’s opening statement (as prepared for delivery) can be found here. Video of Darcy’s opening statement is available here.

###

Town Hall

Sat, 24 Jan 2026 19:00:00 GMT

On Saturday, January 24 at 2:00PM, I am hosting a town hall in Chester to give you an update on the latest actions of the Trump administration, what’s happening in Congress, and how I’m fighting for PA-05 families.

Date: Saturday, January 24, 2026
Event Time: 2:00 PM (Doors open at 1:30 PM)
Location: Widener University - Alumni Auditorium || 1410-1490 Providence Avenue, Chester, PA 19013
Parking: Attendees can park in any of Widener University’s open lots or utilize street parking in non-residential zones. A campus map showing all parking lots and the event venue (Alumni Auditorium) is available here.

**RSVP here or contact the Chester office at (610) 626-2020.

Advance registration is required. Once the venue has reached capacity, no additional attendees will be admitted.

Government Shutdown Telephone Town Hall

Thu, 02 Oct 2025 22:00:00 GMT

On Thursday, October 2, I am hosting a telephone town hall to give you an update on the government shutdown and answer your questions about how I'm fighting for PA-05 families.

Dial 855-274-3980 on Thursday, October 2, at 6:00 pm to listen in and ask a question.

Service Academy Info Session

Wed, 17 Sep 2025 22:00:00 GMT

Join Congresswoman Scanlon’s staff and representatives from military organizations to learn more about the resources available for high school students in PA-05 interested in serving their country. Information will be provided about the application process for receiving a congressional nomination to one of the U.S. service academies, as well as other paths to service available to interested young people.

Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Time: 6:00 PM
Location: Valley Forge Military Academy & College (Mellon Hall) - 1001 Eagle Rd, Wayne, PA 19087
Parking: Onsite parking is available.

Please note: this is the last Service Academy Information Session that the office will host for 2025.

*RSVP here or call the Chester office at (610) 626-2020 no later than Tuesday, September 16.*

Coffee With Your Congresswoman

Wed, 06 Aug 2025 21:30:00 GMT

Join Congresswoman Scanlon for coffee and conversation. While she is home in the district, Congresswoman Scanlon wants to hear from constituents like you about your top concerns and how she can best represent PA-05 when she returns to Washington.

Due to limited venue capacity, we ask that you register for ONLY ONE of the Coffee with Your Congresswoman events being held August 4-7, 2025. This will allow more constituents to participate.

Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Event Time: 5:30 PM
Location: Office of Congresswoman Scanlon, 2501 Seaport Drive, Chester, PA 19013

Sign-ups for this event have surpassed the capacity of the venue. Walk-ins will not be accepted due to venue capacity.

Coffee With Your Congresswoman

Thu, 07 Aug 2025 14:30:00 GMT

Join Congresswoman Scanlon for coffee and conversation. While she is home in the district, Congresswoman Scanlon wants to hear from constituents like you about your top concerns and how she can best represent PA-05 when she returns to Washington.

Due to limited venue capacity, we ask that you register for ONLY ONE of the Coffee with Your Congresswoman events being held August 4-7, 2025. This will allow more constituents to participate.

Date: Thursday, August 7, 2025
Event Time: 10:30 AM
Location: Tinicum Memorial Public Library, 620 Seneca Street, Essington, PA 19029
NOTE: Tinicum Memorial Public Library is not a sponsor of Coffee with Your Congresswoman and is not involved in the planning or content of the event.

Sign-ups for this event have surpassed the capacity of the venue. Walk-ins will not be accepted due to venue capacity.

Coffee With Your Congresswoman

Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:00:00 GMT

Join Congresswoman Scanlon for coffee and conversation. While she is home in the district, Congresswoman Scanlon wants to hear from constituents like you about your top concerns and how she can best represent PA-05 when she returns to Washington.

Due to limited venue capacity, we ask that you register for ONLY ONE of the Coffee with Your Congresswoman events being held August 4-7, 2025. This will allow more constituents to participate.

Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025
Event Time: 10:00 AM
Location: Upper Darby Township Library - Municipal Branch, 501 Bywood Avenue, Upper Darby, PA 19082
NOTE: Upper Darby Township Library - Municipal Branch is not a sponsor of Coffee with Your Congresswoman and is not involved in the planning or content of the event.

Sign-ups for this event have surpassed the capacity of the venue. Walk-ins will not be accepted due to venue capacity.

Coffee With Your Congresswoman

Mon, 04 Aug 2025 20:30:00 GMT

Join Congresswoman Scanlon for coffee and conversation. While she is home in the district, Congresswoman Scanlon wants to hear from constituents like you about your top concerns and how she can best represent PA-05 when she returns to Washington.

Due to limited venue capacity, we ask that you register for ONLY ONE of the Coffee with Your Congresswoman events being held August 4-7, 2025. This will allow more constituents to participate.

Date: Monday, August 4, 2025
Event Time: 4:30 PM
Location: ACLAMO, 801 W. Marshall Street, Norristown, PA 19401

Sign-ups for this event have surpassed the capacity of the venue. Walk-ins will not be accepted due to venue capacity.

CANCELED: Coffee With Your Congresswoman

Tue, 01 Jul 2025 21:30:00 GMT

Due to unforeseen changes in the congressional schedule, this event has been canceled.

Continue to check the “Upcoming Events” page for other opportunities to connect with Congresswoman Scanlon and her office.

Town Hall

Sun, 29 Jun 2025 19:00:00 GMT

On Sunday, June 29 at 3:00PM, I am hosting a town hall in Media to give you an update on the latest actions of the Trump administration, what’s happening in Congress, and how I’m fighting for PA-05 families.

Date: Sunday, June 29, 2025
Event Time: 3:00 PM (Doors open at 2:00 PM)
Location: Delaware County Community College - Academic Building (Large Auditorium), 901 S. Media Line Road, Media, PA 19063

Sign-ups for this event have surpassed the capacity of the venue. For safety reasons, registration is now closed. Entry is not guaranteed; once the venue has reached capacity, no additional attendees will be admitted.

Social Security Telephone Town Hall

Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:30:00 GMT

On Thursday, June 12 at 6:30 pm, I am joining former Social Security Administrator Martin O'Malley, and Reps. Madeleine Dean (PA-04) and Chrissy Houlahan (PA-06) for a conversation focused on how social security may be impacted by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress.

Dial 855-274-3980 on Thursday, June 12 at 6:30 pm to join the conversation!

*RSVP here or contact the Chester office at (610) 626-2020.